One of the reasons that the statute of frauds requires that certain contracts be in writing is so that the contract is easier to prove. If there is a dispute about whether a contract exists or about the terms of a contract, proof that the contract exists and the terms of the contract are easier if the contract is in writing. Do you believe all contracts should be required to be in writing to be enforceable? Why, or why not?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *